Q1-Q7 Dimensional Analysis
Deep Dive into Each Evaluation Dimension • Best Practices • Improvement Areas
Q-Dimension Overview
Q2 (Timely Grading) - Department's Weakest Dimension
Q2 scores 0.17 points below department average. 4 instructors (26.7%) have Q2 scores below 4.00. This is the most cited student complaint and directly impacts student learning.
Clear Guidelines & Expectations
How well the instructor communicated course expectations, requirements, and grading criteria.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Timely Grading
⚠️ WeakestHow promptly the instructor returned graded assignments with feedback.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Student Feedback
"In no reality should an 8-week course have assignments not graded for several weeks."
"Work from October 19th to now that are still not graded."
"Two weeks would be the timeframe for grading, and she did stay on top of it for the first week. However it dragged on later."
Assessment Alignment
✅ StrongestHow well quizzes, projects, and exams aligned with course content and learning objectives.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Active Participation
How well the course encouraged student engagement and active participation.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Timely Responses
How promptly the instructor responded to student emails and questions.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Online Organization
How well the online course materials (Canvas) were organized and accessible.
Top Performers
Needs Improvement
Best Practices
Teaching Methods
How effective the instructor's teaching methods were in facilitating learning.